Saturday, May 14, 2005

H.E. Double Hockey Sticks Part 2


Posted by Hello


Key Question:
“Should the purpose of Christianity be reduced to this: to increase the population of heaven and the decrease of crowdedness of hell?” Mclaren 8

I thought this question was interesting because this was not the focus of Jesus. At the Mosaic Origins conference in L.A. this week the one thing the McManus’ brought up over and over again was that following Jesus isn’t about becoming a “Christian”, it’s about becoming fully human how God intended. The point of Christianity is not to become a Christian and then get to go to heaven someday. It’s about being saved now and making this world a better place.

God as Judge?
“In early biblical times, there was no such thing as a complex court system or jury or constitution or annotated legal code or judicial precedent or nation-state. The judge was – one hoped – a wise, honest, and brave person who helped people resolve disputes and seek justice.” Mclaren 40

Now there is a new understanding of God being the ultimate judge isn’t it? What a fresh and beautiful picture of God. In our day it is easy to have a picture of God as a judge that sentences people and punishes rather than redeems and helps.

Hell in the Old Testament?
“It’s never mentioned once in the whole Hebrew Bible. Even the latest books of the O.T., thought to have been written about 450 B.C. have no reference to hell. Instead the idea appears suddenly to us in the Gospels on the lips of Jesus. Jesus is the first in all biblical literature to talk about hell, and he talks the most about it."

“The Hebrew word SHEOL was translated as hell in the King James Version. But that was a mistake. SHEOL simply meant the place of the dead, the grave. There was no idea of an immortal soul involved and certainly no idea of different destinations for the good and the evil.”

The KJV has screwed up once again. I can’t believe people use this translation after all the errors found in it. Especially the stubborn ones that believe it is the original translation or something. Funny stuff.

So why did Jesus talk about hell?
It is interesting to note that the Pharisees had borrowed the idea of hell from the Greeks and other religions of the day. There was a lot of mixing going on with Judaism during this era. The Pharisees thought hell would be a good way to get sinners to stop sinning because they believed that only then would a Messiah come and redeem Jerusalem and they were getting tired of waiting.

“First they would threaten sinners with hell. Second, they would extend the reward of resurrection from the heroic martyrs of all good people-good meaning those who fulfilled the Pharisees’ ideal of good. Finally, they would use the language of hell to accomplish what they felt they needed to accomplish-to frighten sinners enough to repent and change their way for the good of the nation.” Mclaren 62

After Jesus heard them talk about hell threateningly, he did what he usually did. He turned it right back around on the religious leaders. He didn’t threaten the sinners with hell, he threatened the religious leaders with hell! While reading the Gospels take notice of the context that Jesus spoke of hell in. You will be surprised.

“The Pharisees used hell to threaten sinners and other undesirable and mark them as the excluded out-group, hated by God. Their rhetorical use of hell made clear that God’s righteousness was severe and merciless toward the undeserving. Jesus turned their rhetoric upside down and inside out and used hell to threaten those who excluded sinners and other undesirables, showing that God’s righteousness was compassionate and merciful, that God’s kingdom welcomed the undeserving, that for God, there was no out-group.” Mclaren 74

Does this sound like anyone you know???

“The Pharisees threatened marginal people with hell unless they submitted to their religious dominance. Jesus threatened the religious establishment with hell unless they showed compassion for the marginal people. Hell has been used and abused, back and forth, ever since.” Mclaren 136

True Hell Starts on Earth:
“What could be more serious than standing in front of your Creator-the Creator of the universe and finding out that you had wasted your life, squandered your inheritance, caused others pain and sorrow, worked against the good places of God? What could be more serious than that? To have to face the real, eternal, unavoidable, absolute, naked truth about yourself, what you’ve done, what you’ve become?” Mclaren 79

What is sad is how many “saved” Christians are going to be facing God and having Him look them in the face and say, “you’ve wasted your life.” You thought because you were forgiven that you had crossed the finish line, but that was only the beginning of what I wanted you to do. Not to wait until some “rapture” and hold on tight, but to be a blessing in the world and share the good news.”

I can’t think of any hell that is worse than hearing those words from God either. God I pray that we will not waste our lives here on earth but be on mission with you.

All this talk of fire and brimstone sounds like good metaphors to describe what that must feel like.

Three responses to hell:
Accept it and preach it as the terrible but unavoidable truth
Understand it as temporary and leading to annihilation.
Understand it as purgative and effective at bringing all to repentance and ultimate salvation.
Mclaren 102,103

I’m still not sure where I would fit in on what I think of hell. This is a toughie.

What is the gospel?
Our contemporary modern Western conservative Protestant gospel would say this:

Behavior: Not accepting Jesus Christ as personal savior, not being saved or born again, not asking Jesus into your heart so your sins can be forgiven, etc.

Consequence: Being sent to hell

Point: Accept Jesus as your personal savior.

Shocking Truth: Not one passage from the Gospels says anything remotely like this! There is more to following Jesus than just praying a prayer. It is a lifetime mission!

What was the point Jesus was trying to make about hell in the Gospels?
-It definitely wasn’t to “hold the right beliefs” or “affirm the right doctrines” or anything like that. Instead Jesus was clearly interested in action, in what we do, in how we treat others, especially, and in whether we trust him enough to follow his teaching even if it means difficulty and persecution. It was clear that Jesus wasn’t just saying that anything goes, everything’s OK. He was telling people that they would be held accountable, that how they live no would count forever.

Judgment Vs. Condemnation:

Mclaren says there is a difference between judgment and condemnation. Even though we are saved we will still be judged by what we have done on earth and the person we have become. That was the tension in the gospels.

“Judgment is real. Accountability to God is real. A good, just reconciling, loving, living God is in everybody’s future. The danger of wasting your life and ruining other people’s lives is real. Whatever road you take, you’ll end up facing God, and that means you’ll face the truth about your life-what you’ve done, who you have become, who you truly are. That’s good news-unless you’re a bad dude, you know, unjust, hateful, unmerciful, ungenerous, selfish, lustful, greedy, hard-hearted toward God and your neighbor. You know, if God judges, forgives, and eliminates all the bad stuff, there might not be much left of you-maybe not enough to enjoy heaven, maybe not enough to feel too much in hell either.” Mclaren 137

“Salvation by grace, judgment by works.” Interesting concept here.

Traditional, modern western way of telling the gospel:
1. If you were to die tonight, do you know for certain that you’d go to be with God in heaven?
2. If Jesus returned today, would you be ready to meet God?

New understanding of the gospel:
1. If you were to live for another fifty years, what kind of person would you like to become-and how will you become that kind of person?
2. If Jesus doesn’t return for ten thousand or ten million years, what kind of world do we want to create?
Mclaren 171

This is incredibly refreshing and really shows the harms that the whole “Left Behind” theology has done to God’s Church. What do they care what happens to the world, to people, to the environment. All the want to know if where a human soul will go but Jesus’ gospel is much bigger than that.

If you have several questions about hell I would recommend reading "The Last Word and the Word After That." It has been very thought provoking and as much as people don't want to think about hell, subconsciously it has much to do with your view of the gospel and how you share it with others. I never realized how important this was. I can't wait to hear people's comments on this one!!!

11 comments:

Anonymous said...

Dustin - I am new to, and enjoying your blog. Keep up the interesting writings and I commend you for the work you are doing in NYC.

I gotta throw out something about a McLaren quote (I think) within your post. He said, "There was no idea of an immortal soul involved and certainly no idea of different destinations for the good and the evil."

Job 19:26, as one illustration of many, says, 'And after my skin has been destroyed, yet in my flesh will I see God. I myself will see him with my own eyes - I, and not another.'

Not only an afterlife, but a bodily resurrection as well in the OT.

Dustin said...

Hey Rick,
Thanks for your comment and for doing it in a gracious way. I will definitely have to look into that verse you pointed out. Looks like there will be a part 3 at least on this one. I wonder why Mclaren said that. I would like to know what he thinks of this verse since it seems to be an obvious one. Thanks again! Dustin

Anonymous said...

In response to "rick n" I think that your observation is a valid one but I would like to point out that there is a difference between a bodily resurrection and an immortal soul. The Job passage really is not (as I read it) commenting on whether or not the soul is immortal as much as it is implying a bodily resurrection. (i.e. "yet in my flesh will I see God") Jews up until the time of Christ believed that God was "the God of the living and not the dead". That is to say that when a person died he or she slept until the time of the resurrection. I think that perhaps what McLaren was referring to was this very distinction. Splitting hairs? Maybe. I do think its important though if what we are doing is trying to discover what sort of being we really are.

g13 said...

excellent synopsis and intriguing commentary. i've had the opportunity to read this book, but am not ready to make any comments. thank you for provoking further thought though...

Anonymous said...

Dustin,

Hey man. I just wanted to let you know how much I admire and respect the work you're doing in NYC and enjoy reading your musings, theological and otherwise.
I certainly wish there was a church community like yours here in DeKalb.
Best wishes on the upcoming marriage and I hope everything else is going well for you.
I envy your ability to attend great rock show any night of the week!

Matt
P.S. - I'd like to send you a little longer message via email. I'll get your address from Justin.

Anonymous said...

dustin,

not to continue with the ass-kissing...but i really have enjoyed reading your blog. i think you're full of shit, but enjoyably so. i am currently reading "the last word..." (our discussion group meets at panera bread because drinking beer is a sin, dustin. i'm surprised you didn't know that). that mclaren can really get you thinking can't he. good stuff, dangerous...but necessary. i'm not going to take any stand one way or the other on this blog because i've seen the way your peeps enjoy ripping new assholes for those that do. the only thing i'm going to take a stand on is that all catholics are going hell. right dustin? come on, that is something we can all join arms on...me, you, bob kearney. okay, i'm done.

bill

Dustin said...

Matt - definitely send me an email, i'd love to see what you've been up to. my email is dbagby@gmail.com

Bill - Hahahahaha. That really made me laugh. Thanks for the note. And yes, that is something we can all agree on. "Mary is about as important as my mom" Wow, i can't believe i ever said that. Bob Kearney should have beat the hell out of me!

Anonymous said...

I think we're all pretty much over the "beer is a sin" thing from part 1. Quelle dommage... that ppl cannot obtain the ability to get over shit...

Anonymous said...

While Mary might not be that important, Deb is very important...to me at least.

Alison said...

To bible-sponge- I believe that it's not science versus christianity but science and christianity. A wise professor once said that the enemy of Christianity isn't science it's naturalism. Just something to think about.

Plus I don't think that Christians become "saved" in one moment. I think that they start a journey to becoming "saved" in their life and in the end they are finally saved. Becuase we are not officially saved until we reach the arms of Christ.

Anonymous said...

Dustin - you so rock. Not to sound so churchish but I am thankful that God has allowed my path to cross with just a couple of great people...one being you, the other an Adam we know, who spurs me on. Being a "pastor" can really be tuff at times on being a real person due to the culture in America and the lack of friends who honestly embrace an authentic relationship with another male, especially men of the cloth. (that's another topic.) Anyway, here is a thought that came to me from another friend: if "following Jesus isn’t about becoming a “Christian”, it’s about becoming fully human how God intended". What did God intend us to be? How do we become the fully human God intended? What does that fully human look like? (Jesus. Now that was easy enough.) What is the chief purpose of man? I know we have been taught it's to glorify God but how does one live out that purpose, since the fall? I agree that it is more than gaining heaven and a new room in the Father's house. I agree with the Adam in this blog who said: "I do think its important though if what we are doing is trying to discover what sort of being we really are."
What does it mean to be fully human as God intended?